<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reflections.concept-delivery.com&#187; criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reflections.concept-delivery.com/tag/criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reflections.concept-delivery.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on delivering your concepts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>SAS bashing</title>
		<link>http://reflections.concept-delivery.com/2009/04/sas-bashing/</link>
		<comments>http://reflections.concept-delivery.com/2009/04/sas-bashing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Reflections</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reflections.concept-delivery.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of recent posts have been towards the critical end of the scale with regards to SAS&#174;. This seems a little unfair given my recent experience of working with them in the design phase of a project. The quality their input has been fantastic, and I wonder if we could have come up with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of recent posts have been towards the critical end of the scale with regards to SAS&reg;. This seems a little unfair given my recent experience of working with them in the design phase of a project. The quality their input has been fantastic, and I wonder if we could have come up with as good a design without them. </p>
<blockquote><p>
When I own a Ferrari I will expect to have to pay for regular servicing.
</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-322"></span><br />
Having said all of which, I did notice the costs of the project mounting. I wonder if one could correlate the time spent with SAS to the project budget, and compare this to a benchmark project in which they were not involved in some way? </p>
<blockquote><p>
When I own a Ferrari I don&#8217;t plan to call on the services of a chauffeur too often.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It just goes to show, I suppose, that best practice can be expensive and this is, perhaps, why our SAS environment is in the mess it is. One thing I&#8217;m very wary of is the amount of resource assigned to seemingly mundane tasks where I can&#8217;t see the value they will add. This may be myopia on my part, and I am optimistic that experience (to be gained) will teach me the error of my ways, or that experience (already earnt by colleagues) will find the budget for the SAS resource. </p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/criticism' rel='tag' target='_self'>criticism</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/SAS' rel='tag' target='_self'>SAS</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reflections.concept-delivery.com/2009/04/sas-bashing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

